NCAP: Towards a safer transport
This has come into the light
recently as people and companies have become more aware of safety rather than
just focusing on features and vehicle dynamics.
In the present world scenario, transport is
necessary, and so is safety. For many decades, Automobile companies have been
trying to make their cars safe and robust, but they needed a standard to adhere
to while setting up a benchmark for vehicle safety, according to which the
vehicles of various companies and segments could be accessed on safety parameters.
Comes, NCAP! The New Car Assessment Programme has
aided in not only setting benchmarks but also has emerged as a great comparing
standard when it comes to safety and strength.
The first NCAP was created in
1979, by the United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.This
program was established in response to Title II of the Motor Vehicle
Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972, to encourage manufacturers to build
safer vehicles and consumers to buy them. Over time, the agency improved the
program by adding rating programs, facilitating access to test results, and
revising the format of the information to make it easier for consumers to
understand. NHTSA asserts the program has influenced manufacturers to
build vehicles that consistently achieve high ratings.
NCAP
The first
standardized, 35 mph front crash test was May 21, 1979, and the first
results were released on October 15 that year. The agency established a frontal
impact test protocol based on Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
208 (“Occupant Crash Protection”), except that the frontal 4 NCAP test is
conducted at 56 km/h (35 mph), rather than 48 km/h (30 mph)
as required by FMVSS No. 208.
The European
program, Euro NCAP, was founded in 1997 by the Transport Research
Laboratory for the UK Department for Transport and backed by
several European governments, as well as by the European Union. Based
in Brussels, Belgium, the European program was modelled on the
American program. Other areas with similar programmes include Australia
and New Zealand with ANCAP, Latin America with Latin
NCAP and China with C-NCAP.
The Bharat
New Vehicle Safety Assessment Program (BNVSAP) is being planned for India.
Different NCAPs
are:
|
Name |
Abbreviation |
Founded |
Location |
|
United States New Car Assessment Program |
US NCAP (U.S. NCAP) |
1978 |
Washington, DC, USA |
|
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety |
IIHS |
1959, Ratings from 1995 |
Arlington, VA, USA |
|
Australasian New Car Assessment Program |
ANCAP |
1993 |
Canberra, Australia |
|
Japan New Car Assessment Programme |
JNCAP |
1995 |
Tokyo, Japan |
|
European New Car Assessment Programme |
Euro NCAP |
1996 |
Brussels, Belgium |
|
Korean New Car Assessment Programme |
KNCAP |
1999 |
Seoul, South Korea |
|
China – New Car Assessment Programme |
C-NCAP |
2006 |
Tianjin, China |
|
Latin New Car Assessment Programme |
Latin NCAP |
2010 |
Montevideo, Uruguay |
|
New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asia |
ASEAN NCAP |
2011 |
Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia |
|
Global New Car Assessment Programme |
Global NCAP |
2011 |
London, Great Britain |
|
Bharat New Vehicle Safety Assessment Program |
BNVSAP |
2017 |
tbd |
|
Green NCAP (operated by Euro
NCAP for emissions) |
Green NCAP |
2019 |
Brussels, Belgium |
The safety ratings of some of the Indian cars
according to Global NCAP are shown in the table below.
|
Car |
Passenger Safety |
Child Safety |
|
Mahindra Thar |
4 |
4 |
|
Kia Seltos |
3 |
2 |
|
Tata Tigor |
4 |
3 |
|
Mahindra XUV 300 |
5 |
4 |
|
Tata Altroz |
5 |
3 |
|
Tata Nexon |
5 |
3 |
|
Maruti Wagon R |
2 |
2 |
|
Maruti Swift |
2 |
2 |
|
Maruti Vitara Brezza |
4 |
2 |
We notice Tata's tremendous efforts in improving
the safety of their vehicles namely: Tigor, Tiago, Nexon and Altroz.
Conversely, there is a low star rating in the cars of Maruti, the market leader
in India, but Maruti too is working to improve the safety and product quality
which has resulted in a good 4 star safety rating in its Vitara Brezza.
Lets have a glance on one of the best NCAPs, which
is also accepted in other countries, other that Europen countries.
Euro NCAP
|
European New Car
Assessment Programme |
|
|
|
|
|
Type |
Voluntary Non-Profit |
|
Industry |
Automotive Safety |
|
Founded |
December 1996 |
|
Headquarters |
Leuven, Belgium |
|
Number of locations |
8 Facilities |
|
Area served |
Europe |
|
Services |
Consumer Information |
|
Website |
euroncap.com |
The European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) is
a European voluntary car safety performance assessment
program (i.e. a New Car Assessment Program) based
in Leuven (Belgium) formed in 1996, with the first results released
in February 1997. It was originally started by the Transport Research
Laboratory for the UK Department for Transport but later backed
by several European governments, as well as by the European
Union. Their slogan is "For Safer Cars".
2020 Test
Procedures
Mobile progressive
deformable barrier
The test car is
propelled at 50 km/h (31 mph) into a moving deformable barrier
mounted on an oncoming 1400 kg trolley, also travelling at 50 km/h at a 50%
overlap. This represents hitting a mid-size family car. Two adult male
THOR-50M dummies are seated in the front and two child dummies are placed in
the back. The aim is to assess the crumple zones and the compatibility of the
test car.
Full width rigid
barrier
The test car is
driven into a rigid barrier with full overlap at a speed of 50 km/h
(31 mph). A small female dummy is seated in the driving position and in
the rear seat. The aim is to test the car's restraint system, such
as airbags and seat belts.
Mobile side impact
barrier
A deformable
barrier is mounted on a trolley and is driven at 60 km/h (37 mph)
into the side of the stationary test vehicle at a right angle. This is meant to
represent another vehicle colliding with the side of a car.
Side pole
The car is
propelled sideways at 32 km/h (20 mph) against a rigid, narrow pole
at a small angle away from perpendicular to simulate a vehicle travelling
sideways into roadside objects such as a tree or pole.
Far side impact
The body in
white (frame) of the vehicle is attached to a sled is propelled sideways
to provide accelerations experienced by the vehicle in the side and pole tests,
but on the far side of the vehicle. The far side testing was implemented in
2020 to help combat far side injuries (where the driver is struck from the
opposite side). The ‘excursion’ of the dummy - the extent to which the dummy
moves towards the impacted side of the vehicle - is measured.
If the vehicle is
equipped with centre airbags then a co-driver (front passenger) is added in
either the mobile side impact or the pole test to evaluate its effectiveness.
Whiplash
The vehicle seat
is propelled forwards rapidly at both 16 and 24 km/h (9.9 and
14.9 mph) to test the seat and head restraint's capabilities to
protect the head and neck against whiplash during a rear impact.
Vulnerable road
users (pedestrians & cyclists)
Head Impact
Upper Leg Impact
Lower Leg Impact
AEB Pedestrian
AEB Cyclist
Safety Assist
AEB car-to-car
Occupant status
monitoring
Speed assistance
Lane Support
Rescue and
Extrication
How easy it is for
first responders to extricate the occupant and how
well eCall performs after a collision.
Ratings
Euro NCAP's
ratings consist of percentage scores for Adult Occupant, Child Occupant,
Vulnerable Road Users and Safety Assist and are delivered in the overall rating
of stars, 5 being the best and 0 being the worst.
5 star safety: Overall
excellent performance in crash protection and well equipped with comprehensive
and robust crash avoidance technology
4 star safety: Overall good
performance in crash protection and all round; additional crash avoidance
technology may be present
3 star safety: At least
average occupant protection but not always equipped with the latest crash
avoidance features
2 star safety: Nominal
crash protection but lacking crash avoidance technology
1 star safety: Marginal
crash protection and little in the way of crash avoidance technology
0 star safety: Meeting
type-approval standards so can legally be sold but lacking critical modern
safety technology
Lastly, I would like to comment to the general public, that one must be open to learn good
practices while driving such as using indicators, proper lane changing, and
having a seat belt on.
People usually ignore their part,
believing that the safety features will save him, but one must be very aware of
some basic and important practices during driving. Remember, a lot of the
people who keep a gun at home for safety are the same ones who refuse to wear a
seat belt!
Please
comment which NCAP you assume is the most strictest and safest?
Please visit my blog:
https://pranavlama8.blogspot.com/?m=1
Read my blog on Compact SUV: India’s favourite segment:
https://pranavlama8.blogspot.com/2021/02/compact-suv-indias-favourite-segment.html?m=1
- Pranav Verma

Comments
Post a Comment